Cramming Costs Verizon and Sprint $158M

Published On May 18, 2015 | By Tom Huskerson | News and Analysis

verizon-sprintVerizon and Sprint are paying a dear price for the mystery charges to their customer’s phone bills. The two cell carriers will cough up a combined $158 million to settle investigations into the unauthorized charges or cramming. With this announcement the Federal Communications Commission has settled cramming charges with all four major wireless carriers. AT&T settled in October for $105 million, and T-Mobile settled in December for $90 million. Of the $158 million, Verizon will pay $90 million and Sprint $68 million.

Most of the money from the settlement will go to setting up refund programs for customers victimized by the practice. The cramming charges came from premium text messaging services like horoscopes or celebrity gossip sent directly to the customers phone and costing about $9.99 per month. Verizon kept 30 percent of the fees, and Sprint pocketed 35 percent. Victims of the practice often didn’t sign up for the services and carriers wouldn’t always offer refunds. When asked for proof that customers had signed up for the service Sprint and Verizon “were unable to prove that these services were ever requested.”

As part of the settlement neither company is permitted to charge consumers for premium text messages. They must also implement systems to ensure they obtain a customer’s informed consent before allowing third-party charges. Both Verizon and Sprint have already begun ending these charges.

In a bizarre statement emailed to  The Verge.com Verizon stated “Today’s settlement reflects Verizon’s continued focus on putting customers first.” Verizon claims that it “rigorously protected” customers from these authorized charges. Verizon also says that it had a “broad policy” of allowing refunds on premium text message charges.

Sprint was equally in denial by saying “Sprint was an industry leader in enacting rigorous safeguards to protect customers against unauthorized billing by premium SMS merchants,” The statement went on to say  “Sprint always puts its customers’ interests first,” and that it returned “tens of millions of dollars” in refunds long before this investigation began.

Both Verizon’s refund program and Sprint’s refund program are now accepting claims.

 

Like this Article? Share it!

About The Author

Tom Huskerson Bio Born in Richmond Virginia Tom Huskerson is a military veteran who settled in California after his discharge. Tom attended Santa Barbara City College where he began his writing career as a campus reporter. He worked as an intern news reporter for the Santa Barbara News-Press writing feature stories before moving on to San Francisco. At San Francisco State University Tom studied broadcast communications and began to focus on the Internet. He completed his graduate thesis on Internet advertising. Tom was the first student to ever focus on the Internet as a graduate student at San Francisco State University. After graduation he went to work for Zona Research in California’s Silicone Valley. As a research associate Tom supported senior analyst writing on the latest developments in the Internet industry. During the dot com boom Tom worked for several web businesses as a market researcher and analyst. As a writer and researcher Tom has authored various technical works including a training program for Charles Schwab security. Other projects included professional presentations on workplace violence and hiring security contractors. Tom has also written both fiction and non-fiction works and blogging for a travel website. He has published two books of short stories and completed two novels. Tom is the owner of Scribe of Life Literature and EbonyCandle.com. Tom is not the chief editor for the OnTechStreet. com. A news and information blog that focuses on tech news for African-Americans. The blog is the result of his desire to inform the African American community of the dangers and benefits of the cyber age. In his blog Tom reports on information security, new and analysis, scams and hoaxes, legal happenings and various topics that arise from the age of information. Tom believes that technology is a necessary tool for black people and they should know what is happening. Tom writes believing that techno speak is for the professional and that valuable information can be communicated using plain language. As a result he has embraced the motto, Less Tech, More Knowledge.

Comments are closed.